When I began my banking career many seasons ago, there was no better job to have than Regional President (or Regional Manager, or Area President, or State President…whatever your flavor is). These were the people who heavily influenced (or made) policy and decisions. They set goals, and managed sales, and pointed the direction that new product design had to go. These independent, opinionated leaders managed and guarded their people and branches with a passion, and God help any schmuck in administration who tried to make a policy or procedure change without their approval. In a way, they were the ultimate ombudsmen for customers.
Somehow, in the centralization fever of the ’80s and ’90s, these positions were weakened. Power and authority moved to administration. Yes, it did. Policies were made and announced from there. These regional people became more administrative in focus and began executing plans rather than influencing them. Lending authority for many of them was eliminated or decreased. Too often, this position became the parking place for senior executives from acquired banks that came with the purchase and had to ride out a few final years in peace and obscurity. (And hey, no indignant gasps. We all know this happened.)
Well, I think we need our old regional people back. Badly. Your branches could use them about now.
Now that the Internet is being treated with the right perspective (and the dot com banks are folding like $99 suits), branches are back at the center of thinking and strategic planning – the girl at the prom everybody wants to dance with:
You know, I think about branches in this environment and I keep getting this vision of someone trying to put his mouth around a fire hydrant and drink all the water.
Now, don’t get me wrong. All of these initiatives are very valid. And branches do need to increase their contribution to the bottom line. But somebody has to act as the traffic cop. And the head of Retail Banking or Branch Administration can’t do it alone.
We need our strong regional managers and staff back. And here’s what they need to do:
We need our strong regional managers and staff back because somebody has to get up every morning and think about how all these product and sales initiatives affect customers and branch staff. And they need to argue that point of view every day, even if they are occasionally a bit too one-sided.
Strong field leaders are a sign of any good sales organization. And they make things uncomfortable… and they make thing messy… but success usually is messy, isn’t it?
We need our strong regional managers and staff back.
–tr
BANKING OFFICES BY TYPE OF BANK, 1990-2000 |
||||||
1990 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
All banking offices |
94,127 |
93,914 |
94,980 |
95,793 |
97,002 |
96,339 |
Commercial banks |
62,346 |
66,768 |
68,897 |
70,150 |
71,664 |
71,784 |
—Number of banks |
12,329 |
9,510 |
9,124 |
8,756 |
8,563 |
8,297 |
—Number of branches |
50,017 |
57,258 |
59,773 |
61,394 |
63,101 |
63,487 |
Savings institutions |
21,621 |
15,754 |
14,845 |
14,648 |
14,710 |
14,239 |
—Number of banks |
2,815 |
1,926 |
1,780 |
1,689 |
1,640 |
1,590 |
—Number of branches |
18,806 |
13,828 |
13,065 |
12,959 |
13,070 |
12,649 |
Credit unions |
10,160 |
11,392 |
11,238 |
10,995 |
10,628 |
10,316 |
Source: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; National Credit Union Administration. |