To all banking executives across the land, I have a news flash: your recurring senior management meeting is primarily a waste of time and completely out of touch with the painful strategic challenges you face as leaders.
When an organization throws 10 people together with multi-six figure salaries, the airspace better count and add value to the business. This meeting is costing roughly $1,500 an hour!
But here’s the rub. Literally 95% of banks have pegged their strategic future on a differentiated “customer experience,” yet senior leadership spends a paltry amount of time actually digging into what’s going on with their customers.
What’s Wrong With Leadership?
Today’s weekly or bi-weekly ritual with the bigwigs is often wasteful because of where the agenda and tone of the meeting are focused. Here are a few of the major bugs in the current process:
How to Blow it Up?
In many ways, trying to root out the waste of ineffective leadership meetings is like trying to change a bad habit. It will take a deliberate effort, and there will be bumps in getting to a new rhythm, but man, is it time to try.
The purpose of blowing up the leadership meeting is simply to get grittier and more involved in the bank’s customer experience. Today, bank executives are many levels of abstraction away from what is actually happening with customers, and it’s slowing down progress on how to really compete with a service-focused strategy. In a recent Gonzo column, my partner Terence Roche masterfully revealed just how messed up the service experience is across delivery channels today, and he used the late Steve Jobs of Apple and Jeff Bezos of Amazon as two iconic leaders who love to get their fingernails dirty with everything that touches the customer. These customer-focused companies can provide bankers with insights into how to drive this type of culture in meetings at the top of the house. Based upon research conducted regarding leading customer-experience-focused companies, let’s review what a Gonzo customer-experience-focused leadership meeting could look like:
9:00 AM – The senior management meeting starts with a review of the bank’s Balanced Scorecard objectives for the prior month. The financial update is brief, as materials have been read by the senior team in advance, and time is allotted specifically for Q&A to the CFO.
9:10 AM – There is a review of the bank’s Enterprise Risk Dashboard and similar Q&A to the chief risk officer’s advance report that includes a Compliance Table of all upcoming projects and deadlines requiring new regulatory compliance. An important issue regarding Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) training is discussed and a decision made concerning resource allocations. The CEO enforces a “no whining” role when it comes to talking about regulation.
9:30 AM – The bank’s chief experience officer (“CXO”) reviews the bank’s killer Customer Experience Metrics report. This report is the “Bible” to the senior management team, listing key scores including Net Promoter, Retention, Onboarding Success, Complaint Volume, and performance across key availability and turnaround service levels. There is lively and hard-nosed discussion regarding the root cause of any metrics that are not meeting the bank’s ambitious standard. (FYI – Amazon uses more than 500 service and performance metrics to manage its business.)
9:45 AM – The CXO provides a summary of key insights gleaned from recent Voice of the Customer sources. This feedback is categorized by key source including customer surveys, complaints, comments submitted by employees via a Web-based feedback system, comments made on social media sites and Apple/Google app store postings. The CXO recommends that a deeper dive be undertaken into a large volume of comments being mentioned regarding bill pay password resets. An assignment is made to the head of E-Channels and the CIO to provide an assessment and recommendation by next week’s meeting.
10:00 AM – The team reviews the Customer Experience Process Dashboard. This report summarizes each key customer touch point (e.g. new branch account, online loan application, inbound call center loan servicing request) and indicates in Red, Yellow, Green whether the process meets the bank’s established criteria for service excellence. There is a bright red in the “Refinance Existing Mortgage” section, and the head of Mortgage Banking reviews the status of a project done in partnership with the bank’s internal Six Sigma resource to implement a new and better automated process. The CIO commits to assist in final negotiations regarding a functional shortfall in the integration between the bank’s origination and servicing systems. The head of Mortgage commits to demo the new process within three weeks.
10:15 AM – The head of Commercial Lending provides an Executive Service Review report from the two days he spent working in the Loan Operations department. The bank has a formal program where each senior executive must actually work in a critical department for several days each year. This practice was inspired by the week in 2009 that Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos quietly spent working in one of his company’s Kentucky fulfillment centers.
The Commercial executive creates some humor when he admits that his officers truly were submitting “garbage” information to the back office for loan booking and that he had already held a summit with his lenders regarding new accountabilities to address this situation. He also requested that a Process Improvement Consultant be hired to assist Loan Operations in completing its document imaging upgrade. The CEO congratulates the Commercial executive for his time spent in the tranches.
10:30 AM – The team watches a demo from the CIO of the new mobile P2P offering. The new feature is set to roll out in two weeks, and the CIO and head of Marketing review how this product will be rolled out to customers and employees with some buzz.
During the demo, several executives note a screen that had “compliance crap” that should be simplified, and the head of E-Channels commits to make this change. A bit of fun ensues as executives start to send each other money to practice using P2P.
10:45 AM – The Human Resources executive provides an update on the bank’s ambitious Product and Channel Expert training initiative. This program requires all employees to receive systematic training and testing regarding the bank’s offerings. The HR executive has the management goal of making financial “Genius Bar” gurus out of the entire employee base, including auditors, credit analysts and facilities managers.
10:59 AM – The meeting adjourns with an executive team deeply aware of the current state of the customer experience and deeply motivated and accountable to make specific improvements.
So GonzoBankers, how does your senior leadership meeting compare to the customer-focused, Jobs/Bezos-inspired meeting envisioned in this article? Is your management team getting gritty with the moments of truth about your customers, or are you embroiled in a polite and meaningless discussion of legacy banker issues? It’s important to remember that the first step in getting ready to compete in the customer experience arena across a multitude of new delivery channels is to change the way we lead the business. So, GonzoBankers, blow up the meeting, and blow it up fast.
Once the plunger is pushed on the old-style planning meeting, you may welcome a little direction with your Reconstruction Strategy. The experienced and industry savvy facilitators at Cornerstone Advisors have helped countless banks and credit unions get – and stay – fired up about their institutions’ strategic plans and future direction.
With a Cornerstone Advisors facilitated planning meeting, you’ll get:
Contact Cornerstone Advisors today to talk about revitalizing your tired (or demolished!) strategic planning meeting.
I say this all the time: “Meetings are the bane of management.”
Two hours is too long for a senior management meeting. Cut it by at least 30 minutes and get on with managing.
I would offer an alternative view for the sake of argument. For my entire career I have read advice about how to reduce time spent in meetings and increase efficiency. And yet, these meetings still exist. Why? Just because one does not understand all the dynamics of a system function does not mean that system is not functioning well. I would guess that other things are going on in meetings beyond the content that are important and improve how the system functions.