“Your satisfaction is our top priority. So, if you could try to act really satisfied, that would be a big help.” —Randy Glasbergen
Ask four different industry experts how satisfied bank customers are with their delivery options and you’ll likely get four completely different answers. Recent examples:
So, there are a couple of ways to interpret these numbers:
In other words, looking at these studies, one might conclude that despite the advances of digital delivery there will always be a pretty big group of customers who will continue to choose branches to do their banking.
I don’t buy it.
For example, I just don’t buy that those millennials went to a branch to do something, then used a self-service option to do the same thing, then decided to keep visiting a branch 11 times a year. And I sure don’t think they have 11 transactions a year that can only be done in a branch, unless their lives are way more complicated than mine.
The problem is that these numbers and results are only valid if banks have given customers a great digital experience as an alternative to branches, made them aware of that option, then shown them how to use it. And that just isn’t the case yet.
Most banks:
Until banks have great digital delivery, branch-related survey questions produce a stacked deck.
Yes, I’ll go to a branch to open an account if the online experience is not as good yet. Yes, I’ll go to a branch if I haven’t seen an equally good digital option. But, my prediction is that when given two equally good choices—branch or digital—a large majority of people will choose digital. Seriously, how many of you reading this right now would choose to visit a branch if you had a great digital option? The answer is … let me get my fingers and toes out to count here … right. NONE.
Banks have history here. Customers were happy cashing checks in branches until ATMs came along. They were happy writing checks in stores until their bank gave them a debit card. They were happy calling to get their balance until their bank gave them Internet banking. They were happy to go into a branch to apply for a credit card until an offer came every day in the mail that took about 10 seconds to complete. In every case, given a good alternative, they left the old option in droves. It will be no different with digital delivery. To be fair, banks are not all the way toward building the digital alternative because the tools are still maturing, but they will be—and sooner than everyone thinks.
So what? There is a crucial reason why all of this matters. Financial institutions surveyed for the Cornerstone Performance Report said 79% of all delivery costs are still directed at branches, compared to 21% directed at all digital combined. Seventy-nine percent is too much, and banks can’t afford it. Banks need to reduce the percentage that is spent on branches and redirect it to digital investments.
The way to accomplish that? First, of course banks give customers choices for delivery. I think we all like the idea that we can go to a branch if we really need to, even if we never do. And nobody is saying that customers who really prefer to go to a branch shouldn’t. But at the same time, banks need to give customers digital choices that provide equally good experiences. Then they need to be shown why they should choose the digital option.
A great digital experience will be the choice of most consumers. It will free up dollars banks now spend on physical delivery to be reinvested in an even better digital delivery solution. And the next J.D. Power study will show higher satisfaction scores for digital-only customers.
So, let’s give choice. But let’s make the choice obvious and easy. We really have a unique opportunity for a win-win here.
-tr
Some thoughts: 1) Does visiting the branch 11 times a year mean/include visiting the ATM at the branch? Do members/customers differentiate this in their interpretation of ‘visiting the branch?’ 2) Funds availability for (remote) deposits is an important reason to continue visiting the branch. Risk algorithms (prediction) must continue to improve. 3) Proximity to the branch continues to be an important psychological (financial security/access) barrier to overcome for older generations. Millennials and definitely Gen Z will begin to overcome this barrier (as a course of societal change). 4) Yes, of course, the digital platform must continue to evolve, including ease of authentication, tools at hand for the consumer (the education process is never done), and predictive offers with simple fulfillment.
Chad, I don’t think ASTM transactions counted. This was visit a person. I’m still not sure what they do 11 times a hear. Terence
One reason to physically visit a bank is when they have really good cookies. In the interest of differentiation I wanted to have keg beer on Friday’s. I was shot down because of the usual buzz killer – liability. Try getting food or drink over the digital channel.
When I’ve observed a branch checking account opening in recent history it’s painful and might take 45 minutes. “What will you average monthly collected balance be?” “How many checks will you write each month?” “How many deposits will you make?” On and on. The customer wonders what all the questions have to do with leaving their money in your bank? You know the usual KYC and AML maximum CYA interpretations of the rules. From the customer’s perspective they are the ones taking the risk and don’t understand the criminal treatment.
In my experience, I have no idea how Fintech oriented financial institutions can skip all the steps that my Compliance Officers have deemed to be essential, when opening accounts online. I agree that if an Online Account Opening is as seamless as doing business with Amazon, most would prefer it. That should be the standard. Make it work like Amazon – and then send me a chocolate chip cookie.
Bill, I agree on the complexity of meeting regulatory requirements, which is why I don’t think the digital banks have made as much progress with checking as with a CD or MMC – less to comply with. In fact, I have dealt with some digital banks and I’m not sure they are the service standard to aspire to yet, honestly. And finally, my analysis didn’t even begin to contemplate cookies or beer. Regular access to those would completely tip the retail services apple cart. Terence
Given a great digital experience I will visit a physical branch if I have an issue I think I need to look someone in the eye about or to get into or retrieve from my safe deposit box (I expect drone access to those is five to 10 years, if the FAA gets onboard with lots of drones littering the skies).
Bob: We’ll all have some reason to visit branches. I just think we need to start thinking in terms of minimizing them.
Terence
So why do millennials visit a branch? I just reached out to my test market research group. 24 year old daughter and 3 of her friends who she texted for info.
#1. Once in 12 months for a cash deposit they did not want handed via ATM
#2. Once in 12 months to apply for a credit card.
#3. 0 times
#4. 12 times. Once a month to transfer from savings to checking. (he wanted it that way)
Gus:
That is exactly what my millennial daughter and her friends said. Somebody has got to talk to that guy about in-person transfers (maybe there’s a teller he’s trying to meet?)
Terence